• He noted that in recent years this has included placing recording devices on the children themselves, as well as recording other parties and professionals involved in a case. The judge put this rise down to the increasing availability of equipment and a distrust of the system and its professionals.

    As clients wish to establish the truth of the matter, there is arguably merit that covert recordings can achieve just that. However, the judge highlighted several problems arising from such recordings, including the extent of their lawfulness, whether they are admissible in evidence and their authenticity in the first place. Furthermore in previous cases, notably in M v F (covert recording of children) [2016], the court has shown that adverse findings can be drawn against those who seek to make covert recordings. Clients, therefore, need to be wary of the pitfalls of recordings made in secret and should consider whether doing so may, in fact, be damaging to their case, and ultimately the child concerned.

    This content is correct at time of publication

    Can we help?

    Take a look at our Family and Divorce page for useful information, resources, guidance, details of our team and how we may be able to help you

  • Key contact:

    Get in touch

    Please fill out the below form or alternatively you can call us on 01622 690691

      By submitting an enquiry through 'get in touch' your data will only be used to contact you regarding your enquiry. If you subscribe to any of our newsletters, you can unsubscribe any time using the link in the email. Please view our privacy statement for more information